HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6789 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Vivek Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner and S/Sri Rahul Jain and Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for respondents. 2. At this stage, Court finds that this writ petition can be disposed of reserving a liberty to approach concerned respondent by way of filing a fresh representation mentioning all necessary details to ventilate his grievance for arrears of salary, if any, and subsequently, concerned respondent will take all endeavour to consider aforesaid representation in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. May 6, 2026 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vivek Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Negi, C.S.C., Rahul Jain (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Suprit John Joshi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad