APHC010668452017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 565/2017 Between: 1. K. VENKATAMMA,, W/O LATE SRINIVASULU AGED 53 YEARS, MAID SERVANT 2. K. SUDHAKAR,, S/O NAGAIAH AGED 48 YEARS, STEWARD 3. V. MALLESWARI,, D/O CHENGALRAYULU AGED 44 YEARS, SWEEPER 4. P. KODANDAIAH,, S/O VENKATAPPA AGED 49 YEARS, MALE SWEEPER 5. K. MUNEMMA,, W/O PUTA REDDY AGED 45 YEARS, MAID SERVANT ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE WORKING IN S.V. AYURVEDIC COLLEGE HOSTELS, TTDS, TIRUPATI, R/O TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI J S VENKATESWARA PRASAD IAS, Principal Secretary, State of AP, Revenue (Endts.III) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi at Amaravathi, Guntur District ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for his willful, intentional and deliberate disobedience of the order dt.09.09.2016 in W.P.M.P. No.37654 of 2016 in WP.No.30428 of 2016 passed by Hon'ble Sri Justice A.Ramalingeswara Rao and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL 257 OF 2017 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim directions directing the Respondent herein to accord permission to the Executive Officer, TTDs to absorb and regularize the services of Petitioners pending disposal of the Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V JAGAPATHI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The court made the following ORDER: The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the interim orders dated 09.09.2016, passed in W.P.M.P.No.37654 of 2016 in W.P.No.30428 of 2016. 2. Sri Deva Deepak, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the final order passed in the main writ petition, petitioners are not inclined to pursue the contempt case. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the contempt case is closed. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 27.02.2026 GVK 3 122 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE No.565 of 2017 Date: 27.02.2026 GVK