PAWAN KUMAR RAM @ PAWAN GASITA @ PAWAN KUMAR @ PAWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8857/2026 · 2026-09-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26982 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26982 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28615 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8857 of 2026
------ Pawan Kumar Ram @ Pawan Gasita @ Pawan Kumar @ Pawan, aged about 22 years, son of late Raj Kumar Ram, resident of Kokar Subash Chowk, Jatra Tand, P.O.-Kokar & P.S.-Sadar, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 23.09.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.305 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 21(b)/22(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act and under Section 28 of Arms Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sell of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin and 5.86 gram of brown sugar was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which comes under intermediate quantity and was also in possession of imitation fire arm. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.06.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum-Special Judge, Ranchi, in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.305 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
23.09.2026 Gunjan-