ANJANA RANA AND ANOTHER v. DEVESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
COPC/1385/2026 · 2026-10-06
Sushil Kukreja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26973 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26973 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:43219 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 1385 of 2026
Decided on: 06.10.2026 ________________________________________________ Anjana Rana & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus
Devesh Kumar & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record copy of office order dated 05.10.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representations of the petitioners have been considered and decided.
2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:43219 )
3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to assail office order dated 05.10.2026, in accordance with law, if they are still aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
( Sushil Kukreja )
6th October, 2026 Judge (raman)