APHC010660692013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 373/2013 Between: 1. M/S SRINI FOOD PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,, REGISTERED OFFICE AT 104 'A' BLOCK, OFFICE AT : III RD FLOOR, SAI GANESH TOWERS., PLOT NO.488 & 489, AYYAPPA SOCIETY, MADHAPUR , HYDERABAD., REPRESENTED BY MANAGER HR ( ADMIN), SRI. M.VAMSI MOHAN ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY TO GOVT., ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P.SCRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, A.P.SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HIILS,HYDERABAD 3. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, (APSPDCL), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT: TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER OPERATION CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER OPERATION CIRCLE, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): NJS,J W.P No.373 of 2013 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VENKATA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. GP FOR ENERGY 3. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI 4. P VINOD KUMAR NJS,J W.P No.373 of 2013 3 The Court made the following Order: The writ petition was filed in the year 2013 challenging the proceedings dated 01.11.2012 imposing restrictions and control measures on the accepted contracted maximum demand of 800 KVA. 2. As seen from the docket proceedings, no interim orders were granted. 3. On 03.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for Dismissal”. 4. Though the matter is listed under the caption “for Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even today also. 5. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition for non-prosecution. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:05.03.2026 Ksj