APHC010665652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1323/2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 18.11.2025 in WP.No.8921 of 2025 and further crave leave of this Honble Court to modify to the extent of the order as passed by the Honble Division Bench in WA.No.1168 of 2025 dated 13.11.2025 and pass Between: 1. DAGGUMATI SREEDHAR RAO,, SON OF MOHAN RAO, AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.27-2-766 3RD STREET, A.C.NAGAR, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANTI CORRUPTION BEREAU, ACB HEAD QUARTERS, KRISHNA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA CITY, AP 3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, , ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU ANDHRA REGION, JAIN TEMPLE ROAD, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAWADA CITY, AP. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE CITY 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 6. THE TAHSILDAR, NELLORE TOWN MANDAL, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, (REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT), SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE CITY. 8. MR THIRUMALESWAR REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE CITY. 9. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NELLORE CITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, DOOR NO.24-1-897, ARUNDATIPALEM, MULAPAETA, NELLORE CITY- 524003. 11. THE SUBREGISTRAR, SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE, STONEHOUSEPET, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2 CMR,J & GTK,J W.A.No.1323 of 2025 12. THE SUB REGISTRAR, (DISTRICT REGISTRAR CADRE), 9, KAVIGNAR BHARATHIDASAN ROAD, SEETAMMAL COLONY, MIG COLONY, ALWARPET, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU 600018, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI CITY. 13. MR A MOHAMMAD SADHIQUE, SUB REGISTRAR (DR CADRE) 9, KAVIGNAR BHARATHIDASAN ROAD, SEETAMMAL COLONY, MIG COLONY, ALWARPET, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU 600018, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI CITY. 14. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALAJI NAGAR PS, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 15. K SATYA SUDHA DEVIREDDY VAIYUSATHA DEVIREDDY VASITHAMMA, , WIFE OF K.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, FLAT NO.303, SAKSHI SAI APARTMENT, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. (R2, R3, R9, RIO AND R14 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS APPEAL) ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the authorities to maintain status stay of all further registration in connection with Document No.307 of 1973 situated in Sy.No.808 and petitioners documents Nos.2139 to 2142 of 2023 situated in Sy.No.809 (Old Sy.No.869) of Nellore Bit-II, till the survey and demarcation is done as directed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in WA.No.1168 of 2025 dated 13.11.2025, pending disposal of the appeal and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the order of the learned single Judge pleased to pass in WP.No.8921 of 2024 dated 18.11.2025 by restoring the order dated 16.05.2024, pending disposal of the above said appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. V SURENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 CMR,J & GTK,J W.A.No.1323 of 2025 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) Without challenging the order dated 18.11.2025 of the learned Single Judge passed in Writ Petition No.8921 of 2024, whereby the writ petition was closed giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 03.08.2023 of the District Registrar before the appropriate forum and modifying the interim order dated 16.05.2024, the present writ appeal has been filed. 2. Heard Mr.V.Surendra Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 7 and Mr.D.Ram Babu, learned counsel for respondent Nos.8 to 15. 3. As per the order dated 03.08.2023, the District Registrar, in exercise of his power under Section 82 of Indian Stamp Act has ordered to prosecute the erring officers namely (1) Sri Dubagunta Gopi Krishnamurthy, (2) Sri Vadivel A.C., (3) Sri Daggumati Sreedhara Rao, (4) Sri Devarapu Mahendra, (5) Sri Kukati Kondaiah and (6) Sri Shaik Allabakshu, as per the instructions of the Commissioner and Inspector General issued vide Memo No.G1/1843/2015, dated 08.04.2025. The writ petitioner has prayed for a direction to declare the unilateral cancellation of registered sale deeds as illegal and prayed for other reliefs. 4. After hearing both the counsel, the learned Single Judge closed the said writ petition by the impugned order on the ground that the writ petitioner has not assailed the said orders and only consequential action has been assailed. While closing the writ petition, it is observed that, in view of the above, the interim order passed in the writ petition dated 16.05.2024 was modified. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that he would challenge the order dated 03.08.2023 of the District Registrar, as directed by the learned Single Judge. But his grievance is only relating to the observation made by the learned Single Judge relating to the modification of the interim order dated 16.05.2024. He contends that what is the modification and in what 4 CMR,J & GTK,J W.A.No.1323 of 2025 manner the interim order was modified is not made clear and it is ambiguous. Therefore, his limited grievance in this writ appeal is only relating to the said vague order passed modifying the interim order. 6. The interim order dated 16.05.2024 pertains to the direction not to cancel the document Nos.2139 to 2142 of 2023 on the file of the Sub-Registrar Office, Stonehousepet, Nellore City, till the date of next adjournment. 7. We do not think that any clarification is required to be given in this appeal relating to the said vague order of modification ordered by the learned Single Judge pertaining to the aforesaid interim relief. Suffice it to say that when the main writ petition itself is disposed of or closed, as per law the interim orders passed therein stands co-terminated. Therefore, the question of modifying the interim order when the main writ petition itself is closed does not arise at all. Clarifying the said doubt expressed by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 8. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J ________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date : 27-01-2026 BMS