CRWP-4623 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (116) RINKAL AND ANOTHER STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India seeking official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and also to take action on their representation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P 2. submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 20.04.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Kaithal (Annexure P raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petit not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 4623-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RINKAL AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Mohan Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and also to take action on their representation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 20.04.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Kaithal (Annexure P raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petit not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Kaithal to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4623-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.04.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Mohan Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and also to take action on their representation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P-5). he very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 20.04.2026 before the Superintendent of Police, Kaithal (Annexure P-5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate Superintendent of Police, Kaithal to (O&M) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and also to take action on he very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 5) ion but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate Superintendent of Police, Kaithal to AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4623 decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 3. 4. behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. 5. commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petitio disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 22.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4623-2026 (O&M) (2) decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petitio disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take Haryana, has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take , has advance notice on needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without n is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the 5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.