Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26962 (CAL)

SAIDUL MIYA v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(A)/412/2026 · 2026-07-08

Rai Chattopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction 08.07.2026 Item No. 12 Ct. No. 5 C.R.M.(A) 412 of 2026 AN (REJECTED) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Coochbehar Kotowali Police Station Case No. 542 of 2024 dated 05.06.2024 under Sections 341 / 324 / 129 / 326 / 307 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. In the matter of : Saidul Miya … Petitioner. Mr. Subhasish Mishra Mr. Satyajit Paul Mr. Rounak Ghosh …for the Petitioner Mr. Avrojyoti Das, ld. APP Mr. Gobinda Ghosh Mr. Debabrata Rai …for the State. 1. The petitioners are anticipating arrest in connection with Coochbehar Kotowali Police Station Case No. 542 of 2024 dated 05.06.2024 under Sections 341 / 324 / 129 / 326 / 307 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. 2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. 3. Mr. Subhasish Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioner submitted about the political rivalry between the parties and specific allegation being levelled only against two F.I.R. named accused persons. He has pleaded innocence of his client. 2 4. The submission as above does not inspire the confidence in view of the materials available in the case diary. Recovery of fire arms is apparent from the seizure list whereas the injury reports have suggested fair amount of injury having been inflicted upon the victim. Statement of the witnesses are also available to suggest joint action by the F.I.R. named accused persons in commission of the offence as alleged. 5. Considering all as above, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 6. C.R.M.(A) 412 of 2026 stands dismissed. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)