IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1227 of 2026 Irfan Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Adv. For the Opp. Party : A.P.P ------- 02/30.03.2026 Heard Mr. K.S. Nanda, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.65 of 2021(S). It has been alleged that the miscreants had taken away the truck of the informant but after some distance it did not restart at which they fled away with the mobile and Rs.16,400/- cash of the informant. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been implicated on the confession of the co- accused. Learned counsel submits that no test identification parade has been held and some of the co-accused persons have been granted bail in B.A. No.15279 of 2021 and B.A. No.9553 of 2022. Learned counsel further submits that though it has been mentioned in the impugned order that a cylinder was recovered on the confession of the petitioner, but no such mention finds place in the First Information Report. Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner has got criminal antecedents. However, regard being had to the manner of implication of the petitioner, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.65 of 2021(S). (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Shamim/- Uploaded on: 02/04/2026