- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33011 MFA No. 1430 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1430 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. LOHITHKUMAR M S/O. MUNIYALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.11, 4TH CROSS, 27TH MAIN, VGS LAYOUT, EEJIPURA, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BENGALURU -560 047 2. MRS. VANAJAKSHI M W/O. NARASIMHAMURTHY, D/O. MUNIYALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1735, 41ST CROSS, 22ND MAIN, JAYANAGAR 4TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 041 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. KUMARASWAMY M.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. RAMASWAMY M S/O. MUNIYALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14, 4TH CROSS, Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33011 MFA No. 1430 of 2025 27TH MAIN, VGS LAYOUT, EEJIPURA, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 047 2. MR. VIVEK JAISWAL S/O. MR. GOPAL NARAYAN JAISWAL, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.126/1, 1ST FLOOR, 1ST MAIN, 3RD CROSS, S.T. BED AREA, KORAMANGALA 4TH BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 053 3. MR. M. JAGADISH KUMAR, S/O. MR. PUKHRAJ, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.114, MUNIYAPPA BUILDING, MILL ROAD, AKKIPETE, BENGALURU - 560 053 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARAVIND BABU J.,ADVOCATE FOR R1) (BY SRI. T.S.VENKATESH ADVOCATE FOR R3) (NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 IS DISPENSED V/O DATED 14.03.2026) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.1.2025 PASSED ON I.A. NO.2 IN O.S.NO.6646/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-5), ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33011 MFA No. 1430 of 2025 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants is present. He submits that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties. A settlement agreement has been filed under Section 89 of CPC read with Rules 24 and 25 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005. 2. In view of the matter having been settled before the mediation centre amicably, this appeal would not survive for consideration. The appeal is disposed of as having been settled. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31