Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2695 (JHR)

MD PAPPU ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1148/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:9287] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1148 of 2026 1. Md Pappu Ansari, Aged about 32 years, Son of Md. Shamsuddin @ Sakho, Resident of Machhali Mohalla, Giridih, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District Giridih. 2. Md. Laden @ Tausif Alam, Aged about 28 years, Son of Md. Maksud 3. Md. Ekhlakh, Aged about 35 years, Son of Md. Samsul. Petitioner No 2 and 3 Resident of Chudi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. 4. Md. Tajuddin @ Tajuddin Ansari, Aged about 30 years, son of Md. Pappu Ansari, Resident of Gaddi Mohalla, Hatiya Road, Giridih, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. 5. Md Sanny, Aged about 35 years, Son of Md Sarwan, Resident of B.B.C. Road, Azadnagar, Giridih, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. 6. Md. Najis @ Najis Siddiki, Aged about 22 years, Son of Masud Alam Siddiki, Resident of Shastri Nagar Road Bhandaridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih. 7. Wasim Raja @ Md. Raja, Aged about 34 years, Son of Ahmad Hussain, Resident of Bhandaridih, Giridih, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. 8. Md. Mohshin Alam, Aged about 36 years, Son of Samsher Alam, Resident of Gadi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. 9. Md Sunny Rayeen @ Md Sunny, Aged about 29 years, Son of Md. Mannan, resident of Gadh Mohalla, Pachamba, P.O. & P.S. Pachamba, District- Giridih. 10. Md. Hussain, Aged about 36 years, Son of Md. Samid @ Md. Hamid, Resident of B.B.С. Road, kaji Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District Giridih, 11. Md Yunush, Aged about 42 years, Son of Ekbal Ahamad, Resident of B.B.C. Road, kaji Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. [2026:JHHC:9287] -2- 12. Md Raja Alam, Aged about 35 years, Son of Md. Salim, Resident of B.B.C. Road, Kaji Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih, Town District- Giridih. 13. Chhotu Khan @ Md. Chhotu @ Lal, Aged about 32 years, Son of Manowar Khan, Resident of Kureshi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S.- Giridih Town, District- Giridih. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ------ 04/ 01.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.280/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(3), 324(4), 109, 126(2), 351(2) of the BNS and Section 27 of Arms Act, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that there is allegation against 100 unknown persons and 24 named persons of going on the spot where the work was being conducted by the labourers and interfering and assault. He then submits that there are general and omnibus allegations of assault. He further submits that in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 830 of 2026 by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the [2026:JHHC:9287] -3- prayer and submits that the allegations are there of going on the spot and making assault. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegations are there against one Md. Khora Raja, who has fired and that allegation is not against these petitioners. The allegation is made against 24 named persons and 100 unknown person and further in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforementioned A.B.A. 6. In that view of the matter, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-01.04.2026 Amitesh/-