FULO MANDAL @ FULWA MANDAL @ FULU MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8179/2026 · 2026-09-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26948 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26948 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:28664 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8179 of 2026
------ Fulo Mandal @ Fulwa Mandal @ Fulu Mandal, aged about 55 years, S/o Ishwar Mandal, R/o Village-Jhilua, P.O.-Deolbari, P.S.- Narayanpur, District-Jamtara.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.03 Dated- 23/09/2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ranchi Rail P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 123 and 305(C) of the B.N.S, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner indulged in causing hurt by means of poison and committed theft by means of transportation. It is next submitted that in this case there is no victim and only because the co-accused was in possession of Alprazolam and Loprazolam tablet and in his confessional statement, he named the petitioner, hence, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is then submitted that the co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 15.05.2026 in B.A. No.4140 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-22 of the instant bail application and chargesheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-V, Ranchi in connection with Ranchi Rail P.S. Case No. 21 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 23/09/2026 Abhiraj/