Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26945 (HP)

STATE OF HP AND OTHERS v. PRABH DAYAL

CMP.M/1418/2026 · 2026-10-05

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

State of H.P. & Others versus Prabh Dayal RSA No. of 2026 05.10.2026 Present: Mr. H.S. Rawat, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the appellant. CMP (M) No.1418 of 2026 Notice issued against the respondent, received back after due service. Despite service of notice, no one has put appearance on behalf of the respondent. Further wait is not justifiable. The accompanying appeal preferred by the applicant is barred by limitation, as such, the present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 28 days. Since, the averments, as made in the application, remained uncontroverted, as respondent, despite service, has not put appearance to contest the application. Consequently, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the accompanying appeal is ordered to be condoned. The application stands disposed of. RSA No. of 2026 Be registered. Let notice be issued to the respondent returnable within a period of four weeks on taking steps within seven days. (Virender Singh) Judge October 05, 2026 (ps)