Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26935 (KAR)

P. SRIRAMULU REDDY, v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

WP/14609/2026 · 2026-07-07

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34266 WP No. 14609 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 14609 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. P. SRIRAMULU REDDY, S/O GANGI REDDY, REPRESENTED BY THE SPA HOLDER, MR. G.B. DINAKAR REDDY, S/O BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO. 144, 4TH FLOOR, KGA ROAD, AMARJYOTI LAYOUT, NEXT TO CESSNA PET CLINIC, DOMLUR, BENGALURU-560071 2. G. B. DINAKAR REDDY, S/O BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO. 144, 4TH FLOOR, KGA ROAD, AMARJYOTI LAYOUT, NEXT TO CESSNA PET CLINIC, DOMLUR, BENGALURU-560071 3. VENKATESAN E, S/O ELUMALAI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO. 2/146, BHARATHI NAGAR, CHENGUM (TK), RENGER KOLLAI, ANDIPATTI, TIRUVANAMALAI, TAMIL NADU-606703 4. PALANI, S/O KUPPUSWAMY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1-60, SULAIKKARA M STREET, KADAYAM, NALLAPALAYAM, VILLUPPURAM, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34266 WP No. 14609 of 2026 TAMIL NADU-605701 5. GOVINDA A, S/O ANNAMALAI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 132, SCHOOL STREET, SU KAMBUPATTU, PAVITHRAM, TIRUVANAMALAI, TAMIL NADU-606806 6. JAYAKUMAR A, S/O ANNAMALAI G, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT VALAVETTI ROAD, SU KAMBUPATTU, PAVITHRAM, TIRUVANAMALAI, TAMIL NADU-606806 7. KRISHNAMURTHY P, S/O PICHANDI M, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT NO. 542, 7TH CROSS, SHANTHIPURA, NAIDU LAYOUT, ELECTRONIC CITY 2ND PHASE, BHOVI PALYA, BENGALURU-560099 8. PRITHVI RAAJ VISWANATH DEVATHA, S/O D VISWANATH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO. 586, SHANTHINIKETAN LAYOUT, NEAR JP VIDYA KENDRA, ARAKERE, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560076 9. N RAKSHITA, D/O N SHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. R/AT NO. 12/90, 25TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD B CROSS, BTM LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BILEKAHALLI, BENGALURU-560076 10. MR. T. CHINNABBA NAIDU, S/O LATE GOVINDA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34266 WP No. 14609 of 2026 RESIDING AT NO.4-1995-25, DAYANAGAR COLONY, CHITTOOR-517 002 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AJIT P B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU- 560009 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER., BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU-560009 3. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, SHANTHIPURA PANCHAYAT, BENGALURU-560099 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, SHANTHIPURA PANCHAYAT, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560099 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 & R2; V/O DATED 30.6.2026, SRI. M.S. PRAKASH., ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO REFRAIN FROM INTERFERING WITH THE PETITIONERS PEACEFUL POSSESSION OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SITES (SITE NOS. 207, 208, 209, 226, 224, 225, 223, 210, 216 AND 215) FORMED IN SY.NO.143 AND SY.NO.97, SITUATED AT CHIKKA NAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT, WITHOUT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34266 WP No. 14609 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a) Issue Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to refrain from interfering with the Petitioners' peaceful possession of their respective sites (Site Nos. 207, 208, 209, 226, 224, 225, 223, 210, 216 and 215) formed in Sy.No.143 and Sy.No.97, situated at Chikka Nagamangala Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District, without following due process of law; b) Issue Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.1, 2 and 3 to consider the Petitioners' representation letters dated 05.01.2026, 05.01.2026 and 05.01.2026 vide Annexure V,W and X. c) Pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity; 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not press prayer ‘a’ but he only presses prayer seeking for consideration of the representations submitted by the petitioners. 3. The petitioners submitted representations on 05.01.2026 at Annexures-V, W and X to respondents No.1, 2 and 3 to act in terms of the applicable law and not take any action without serving any notice etc. Such a representation having been submitted, any action to be taken by respondents would have to be so done in accordance with law by providing an opportunity to the persons who would be affected by - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34266 WP No. 14609 of 2026 any action of the respondents; an opportunity to place their say on record as also to consider the documents furnished by them. 4. Here the petitioners claimed to be the owners of several plots under registered sale deeds. These documents, forming part of public record, would have to be considered by respondents before passing necessary orders. 5. In that view of the matter, this Court passes the following: ORDER i) The Writ Petition is partly allowed. ii) Respondents are directed to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 05.01.2026 at Annexures – V, W and X and pass necessary orders within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. iii) Until then, the respondents are restrained from taking any coercive steps against the petitioners. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE PRS, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10