1 HN, J C.C.No.401_2015 APHC010663752015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 401/2015 Between: 1. Y.B.KESI REDDY, KADAPA DIST., SON OF Y.B.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.2-15, YERRAGUDIPADU, KAMALAPURAM MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. AJAY JAIN I A S HYD 3 OTHERS, CHAIRMAN, THE ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, HYDERABAD 2. SRI K VIJAYANAND, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD., VIDYUTH SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI P KUMAR BABU, THE CHIEF ENGINEER (O&M), RAYALASEEMA THERMAL POWER PROJECT, V.V.REDDY NAGAR, KADAPA. 4. SRI A V RAO, THE DIRECTOR (HR), A.P.GENCO, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Honourable Court passed in 2 HN, J C.C.No.401_2015 W.P.M.P.No.43870 of 2014 in W.P.No.35070 of 2014 dated 08.12.2014 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 41 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the presence of the petitioner / Respondent No.1 herein before this Hon'ble Court order 19-01-2016 in C.C.No.401 of 2015 in the above contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V SESHA KUMARI 2. K ARUNA(SC FOR APGENCO) 3 HN, J C.C.No.401_2015 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.35070 of 2014 and batch were disposed off by this Court by an order dated 18.11.2022. In view of the said order and the disposal of the writ petition, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:10.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J C.C.No.401_2015 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:401 of 2015 Date: 10.03.2026 NKA