Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26933 (JHR)

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR BHUIYA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1153/2026 · 2026-09-24

Ram Sharma, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2026:JHHC:28810-DB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1153 of 2026 1. Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Bhuiya, aged about 27 years, son of Bhola Bhuiya, 2. Amit Kumar, aged about 19 years, son of Suresh Beldar, Both the resident of village- Upper Mandra, P.O.- Nawagarh, P.S.- Barora, Dist.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand ---- --- Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SHARMA --- For the Appellants : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Spl.P.P. 02/24.09.2026 Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.08.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-II, Bermo at Tenughat in A.B.P. No. 376 of 2026 arising out of Dugdha (Jharia O.P.) Case No. 79/2021, corresponding to G.R. No. 1573 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected. It has been alleged that the accused persons in order to create terror in the Dugdha Mines of B.C.C.L. had exploded a bomb and had also given threat on Whatsapp. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants have been implicated on the confessional statement of co-accused persons. Learned counsel further submits that the appellants do not have any criminal antecedents and in similar circumstances some of the co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this court in Cr. Appeal (DB) no.181 of 2026. Learned Spl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant. Regard being had to the manner of the implication of the appellants and the fact that some of the co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail as noted above, we while setting aside the order dated 07.08.2026 -2- passed by the learned Sessions Judge-II, Bermo at Tenughat in A.B.P. No. 376 of 2026 arising out of Dugdha (Jharia O.P.) Case No. 79/2021, corresponding to G.R. No. 1573 of 2021, direct the appellants to surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks and on their surrender, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Dugdha (Jharia O.P.) Case No. 79/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. This appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) (Ram Sharma, J) Dated:24.09.2026 Jay/-