Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26930 (JHR)

BIKASH KUMAR SAHA ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR SAHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7592/2026 · 2026-09-21

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:28499 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7592 of 2026 Bikash Kumar Saha @ Vikash Kumar Saha aged about 21 years son of Sanjay Saha, Resident of Village-Mehndipur, P.O. and P.S. Rajmahal, District-Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, APP For the Informant : Mr. Gautam Kumar Singh, Advocate --- 07/21.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 197 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 87, 137(2), 351(2), 352, 140(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M. Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge sheet in the present case has been filed for the alleged offence under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that statement of the victim has been called for from the concerned court that may be perused. 4. The learned counsel for the informant and the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the victim is minor. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and upon going through the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein the victim has stated that she went with the petitioner to Tarapith and no further allegation has been made by the victim against the petitioner and charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Rajmahal, ( 2026:JHHC:28499 ) 2 in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 197 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner will not disturb the victim in any manner and in case of any disturbance, it is open to the victim to get the bail of the petitioner cancelled. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 21.09.2026 Uploaded on : 23.09.2026 Binit/