Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26928 (HP)

KULWARAN SINGH v. SHIVAM PARTAP SINGH

COPC/1552/2026 · 2026-10-05

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:43117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 1552 of 2026 Date of decision: 05.10.2026. Kulwaran Singh ...Petitioner. Versus Shivam Partap Singh & another ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate. Ranjan Sharma, Judge: Petitioner has invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance to the order dated 12.03.2026 [Annexure P-1], in CWP No. 2803 of 2026, titled as Kulwaran Singh versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another, whereby the Coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following orders:- “This petition, accordingly, as prayed for, is disposed of with the direction that let representation of the petitioner be decided, in the light of the averments made therein as well as the judgment being relied upon by the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks by the Competent Authority. It is clarified that 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- this Court has not expressed any view on the merits of the case and the representation shall be decided by the Authority independently without being influenced by any observation made by this Court in this regard.” 2. Basing reference to the orders dated 12.03.2026, [Annexure C-1], Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the Respondents have neither decided the representation nor any speaking order has been conveyed to the petitioner as yet. 3. Heard. 4. Notice. Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 5. As prayed by Learned Counsel for petitioner and considering the matter in above perspective, this Court disposes of the instant petition with direction to the Respondents/Competent Authority to decide the representation within a period of six weeks from today positively [if not already decided]. 6. Needless to say that in case the representation has already been decided, the decision on the representation/ speaking order be conveyed to the petitioner within the aforesaid period. -3- 7. In aforesaid terms, the instant proceedings are closed and notice is discharged. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 5th October, 2026. (kck)