APHC010657212022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9667 Between: 1. HARUN, S/O HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D.NO.1 MOHIN NAGAR, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 2. SHEIK CHAND BASHA,, S/O SHAIK KHASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1 ANANTAPURAM. DISTRICT. 3. S.ABDUL GAFOOR,, S/O HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, D.NO.1-247, MOHIN NAGAR, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. M.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, , S/O LATE.JAMEEL KHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, ADVISOR MASJID,KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. G.ALAM NAWAZ, ,S/O G.MAGDOOM TEER, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, R/O D.NO. 11 ROAD,KADIRI,ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI. 2. SHAIK IMRAN, THE INSPECTOR AUDITOR, AP STATE WAQF BOARD, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9667 OF 2022 HARUN, S/O HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D.NO.1 MOHIN NAGAR, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. SHEIK CHAND BASHA,, S/O SHAIK KHASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-661-1,KHAJA NAGAR,KADIRI, ANANTAPURAM. DISTRICT. S.ABDUL GAFOOR,, S/O HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 247, MOHIN NAGAR, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI M.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, , S/O LATE.JAMEEL KHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, ADVISOR-CUM-JOINT SECRETARY, AKBARIYA MASJID,KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. G.ALAM NAWAZ, ,S/O G.MAGDOOM TEER, AGED ABOUT 48YEARS, R/O D.NO. 11-29,PATAKUMMARA STREET, IQBAL ROAD,KADIRI,ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND F ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI. SHAIK IMRAN, THE INSPECTOR AUDITOR, AP STATE WAQF BOARD, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3327] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY HARUN, S/O HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, D.NO.1-247, MOHIN NAGAR, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. SHEIK CHAND BASHA,, S/O SHAIK KHASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 NAGAR,KADIRI, S.ABDUL GAFOOR,, S/O HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 247, MOHIN NAGAR, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI M.BASHEER AHMED KHAN, , S/O LATE.JAMEEL KHAN, AGED ETARY, AKBARIYA MASJID,KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. G.ALAM NAWAZ, ,S/O G.MAGDOOM TEER, AGED ABOUT 29,PATAKUMMARA STREET, IQBAL ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) F ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC SHAIK IMRAN, THE INSPECTOR AUDITOR, AP STATE WAQF ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash all further proceedings in FIR. No. 316/2022 before the Kadiri Town Police station, Ananthapuram, against the petitioners/A1 to A5 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of certified copies in FIR. No. 316/2022 before the Kadiri Town Police station, Ananthapuram, against the petitioners/A1 to A5 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in in FIR. No. 316/2022 before the Kadiri Town Police station, Ananthapuram, against the petitioners/A1 to A5 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following Order : This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the Petitioners herein/A.1 to A.5, to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 316 of 2022 of Kadiri Town Police Station, Ananthapuramu District registered for the offence punishable under Section 380 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the Respondent/ State. 3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that police completed investigation in the aforesaid case and referred it as ‘undetectable’ vide C.No.334/REF/SDPO-K/2025, dated 23.10.2025 of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Kadiri, and in view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in the present Criminal Petition and the same has become in fructuous. 4. In view of the same, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as in fructuous. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K.SREENIVASA REDDY, J Date: 23.03.2026 KK