APHC010657632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4255 OF 2025 Between: 1. Smt. P. SUBBA LAKSHMI, W/o. Late Narsimha Murthy, aged about 68 years, R/o Rolugunta Village, Rolugunta Mandal, Anakapalli District. ...Petitioner AND 1. DR. B. VENKATA RAMANA, MSC PHD, The Tahsildar Makavarapalem, Anakapally District. ...Respondent Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon and punish the respondent/Tahsildar/contemnor under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for his willful, deliberate and intentional disobedience of the orders of this Honble Court dated 11/08/2025 in W.P.No.21059 of 2025 and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: K.V. SATYA RAMACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.4255 of 2025 ORDER:- The petitioner filed Mee-seva application dated 12.06.2025 for grant of e-Pattadar Passbook-cum-Title Deed and mutation of her name in all online Record of Rights such as Adangal, Pahanies, 1-B Register connected to 1/5th share of her landed properties covered by Survey Nos.9, 10-1, 10-2, 11, 13, 15, 16, 32, 57, 58, 59, 61, 71, 97-14, 110-1, 214, 215-1, 217, 218-2, 288, 230-2, 306, 307-1, 307-2, 311, 312, 313, 327, 366, 402-1, 409, 416 of Tootipala Revenue Village of Makavarapalem Mandal of Anakapalli District. 2. As the 4th respondent has not disposed of the said application dated 12.06.2025, the petitioner filed W.P.No.21059 of 2025 seeking a direction to respondent authorities to examine the representation dated 12.06.2025 and pass appropriate orders. This Court accordingly directed the Tahsildar to dispose of the representation/application dated 12.06.2025. 3. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner also stated that the unofficial respondent in W.P.No.21059 of 2025 has filed Writ Appeal in W.A.No.1003 of 2025 dated 15.09.2025 against the order dated 11.08.2025 in W.P.No.21059 of 2025 and the Division Bench has confirmed the same and granted liberty to the Tahsildar to decide whether the Tahsildar is having jurisdiction to consider such 3 application and whether it is a matter to be decided by the Revenue Authorities or requires adjudication by the Civil Court. 4. The 4th respondent/Tahsildar has passed an order dated 18.09.2025 as directed by this Hon’ble Court. 5. Pursuant to the directions of this Hon’ble Court, the 4th respondent/Tahsildar has disposed of the Mee-Seva application vide proceedings dated 18.09.2025 and has passed an order accordingly, communicated the decision to the petitioner. Therefore, there is no violation or disobedience of the order of this Hon’ble Court. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. If the petitioner has aggrieved by the order dated 11.08.2025 he is at liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate forum. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 23.02.2026 RMR 4 34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No:4255 OF 2025 Date: 23.02.2026 RMR