Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26924 (KAR)

SMT NETRAVATHI v. GOVT OF KARNATAKA

MFA/1680/2022 · 2026-07-01

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34431 MFA No. 1680 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1680 OF 2022 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT NETRAVATHI W/O LATE M S MAHADEVA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS NO.631 1ST FLOOR ASHRAM ROAD HINKAL MYSORE-570 017 2. SIR M S MURALIDHAR S/O LATE M S MAHADEVA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.631 1ST FLOOR ASHRAM ROAD HINKAL MYSORE-570 017 3. SRI M S HARSHA S/O LATE M S MAHADEVA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NO.631 1ST FLOOR ASHRAM ROAD HINKAL, MYSORE-570 017 Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34431 MFA No. 1680 of 2022 4. SMT HEMAVATHI W/O SRI SHWETHA KUMAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS P B NO.5, KUTTA COORG DISTRICT-571 250 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V. JAVAHAR BABU., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GOVT OF KARNATAKA CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 2. TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER MADDHU TOWN MADDUR MANDYA DISTRICT-571 428 3. KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT ENGINEER MADDUR MANDYA DISTRICT-571 428 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. J. ESHWARAPPA., AGA FOR R1) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(c) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.01.2021 PASSED IN MISC.PETITION NO.32/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34431 MFA No. 1680 of 2022 SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE MISC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT The registry has raised an objection with regard to the maintainability of this appeal in view of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Court Act, as the subject value of the appeal is less than 10 lakhs. The objection raised by the registry is sustained. 2. The appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 3. Liberty is reserved to the appellants to move the appropriate forum for appropriate relief. The time spent herein shall be condoned, if any such proceedings are filed. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:34431 MFA No. 1680 of 2022 4. Certified copies of the documents produced shall be returned to the learned counsel for the appellants. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1