- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33507 MFA No. 9467 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9467 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI VENKATESHAPPA S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. 2. SRI HOMBEGOWDA S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 3. SMT. GALAMMA W/O. LATE CHIKKAGALAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 4. SRI HONNAPPA S/O. LATE CHIKKAGALAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 5. SRI CHANDRASHEKAR S/O. LATE CHIKKAGALAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. APPELLANTS 1 TO 5 ARE R/AT: HEMMIGAPURA VIDHYAPEETA POST KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 060. 6. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMI W/O. VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT: NO.93, 3RD CROSS RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR KANCHANAHALLI Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33507 MFA No. 9467 of 2018 MYSORE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 098. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SURESH DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI G. MUNIRATHNAIAH S/O. LATE GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT: HEMMIGAPURA VIDHYAPEETA POST KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 060. 2. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA W/O. SRI MUNIRATHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT: HEMMIGAPURA VIDHYAPEETA POST KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK - 560 060. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI RAVINDRA T, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.09.2018 PASSED ON I.A.NOS.1 & 2 IN OS.NO.1050/2016 BY I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:33507 MFA No. 9467 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellants, when the matter is called-out at 12:25 p.m. 2. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. The appeal is of the year 2018. Therefore, it appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same pales into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31