Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26915 (AP)

Smt. Yemuka Lalithamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/31752/2018 · 2026-02-08

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010659242018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31752/2018 Between: 1. SMT. YEMUKA LALITHAMMA,, W/O. Y. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. INDLURU VILLAGE, HARIJANAWADA, PENAGALURU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI (AMARAVATHI), GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GOLLAPUDI, VIAJYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, PENAGALURU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Tahsildar, Penagaluru 2 Mandal in not updating his digital signature in the computer online web revenue records so far as the petitioners land in Survey No.1379 admeasuring Ac.4.95 cents situated at Konduru Village, Penagaluru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District is concerned, as being illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, apart from being violative of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act and Rules thereunder and issue a consequential direction directing the Tahsildar to update his digital signature in the computer online records in respect of the above said land is concerned, with a further direction not to interfere with the rights of the petitioner without following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Survey No.1379 admeasuring Ac.4.95 cents situated at Konduru Village, Penagaluru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Tahsildar, Penagaluru Mandal to update his digital signature forthwith as against the petitioners land in Survey No.1379 admeasuring Ac.4.95 cents situated at Konduru Village, Penagaluru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A GIRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri G.V. Sri Rama Murthy, learned counsel, representing Sri A. Giridhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 09.02.2026 KAS 4 417 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31752/2018 Dated: 09.02.2026 KAS