Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27218 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-616 Year-2025 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Chandani Kumari D/O Parasnath Singh Resident of Village- Dhibara Mohalla, Ward No. 4, P.S.- Bikramganj, Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 15-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Bikramganj P. S. Case No. 616 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8(C) and 21(B) of the NDPS Act. 3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 03.09.2025, the informant received a secret information that petitioner’s brother with one accused person are selling heroin. Upon receiving the information, police personnel reached the house of the petitioner’s brother and caught them but the petitioner managed to flee away after throwing one white coloured puriya
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27218 of 2026(4) dt.15-07-2026 2/3 of heroin. Upon a search of the residence of the accused persons, 52 puriyas (weighing 32.08 grams) of heroin and cash amounting to Rs. 1,37,600/- were recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that petitioner is a young lady, who is pursuing B.Sc from Bikramganj and was not present when the raid was being conducted at the house. So, there is no question of throwing any puriya. It is also stated in para 3 of the bail petition that petitioner has clean and fair antecedent. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas, Sasaram in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27218 of 2026(4) dt.15-07-2026 3/3 connection with Bikramganj P. S. Case No. 616 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS. ayush/divya/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U T