Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26906 (PNJ)

SATISH SOOD v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/31010/2026 · 2026-07-08

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31010-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.07.2026 Satish Sood …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and Ors. …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Ivan Singh Khosa, Advocate Mr. Shivam Grover, Advocate Mr. Aarav Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Sant Pal Singh Sidhu, Sr. Advocate Ms. Payal, Advocate Mr. Udaiveer Singh, Advocate for the respondent. Mr. Sant Pal Singh Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate Mr. Shailender Kashyap, Advocate for the applicant in CRM-26863-2026. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 19.05.2026 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Director, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab, whereby, the investigation has been transferred from the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to D.I.G, Ludhiana Range. 2. Learned State counsel on instructions from S.P Rupinder Kaur submits that the impugned order has been withdrawn by the competent authority. HITESH 2026.07.08 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-31010-2026 (O&M) -2 3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court and the petition is accordingly, disposed of. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s), disposed of, accordingly. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.07.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.07.08 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh