Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26906 (AP)

MARNI RAMESH, E.G. DIST. v. SECRETARY., A.P.G.L.I., HYD & 5 OT

WP/20538/2013 · 2026-03-08

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010658112013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20538/2013 Between: 1. MARNI RAMESH, E.G. DIST., S/O.LATE BALARAMA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.19-3-1/1, RATNAMPETA, ABBANNAREDDY STREET, RAMACHANDRAPURAM-533255, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SECRETARY A P G L I HYD 5 OT, ANDHRA PRADESH GOVERNEMNT LIFE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DIRECTORATE OF INSURANCE, DIRECTORATE OF INSURANCE DEPARMTENT, GOVERNEMNT OF A.P., GOVERNEMNT INSURANCE BUILDING, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD- 500 001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE, DISTRICT INSURANCE OFFICE , GOVTERNMENT OF A.P., NEAR MASZID CENTRE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MANDAL PRAJA PARISHAD, RAYAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. MARNI TULASI RAJA RAJESWARI, W/O. SAKURATRI SATYANARAYANA, TEACHER, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-99/1, NEAR RAMALAYAM, K. GANGAVARAM, K. GANGAVARAM MANDAL, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST 2 GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. GANNI PUSHPAVATHI, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 1-25, NEAR POST OFFICE, THAMARAPALLI, K.GANGAVARAM MANDAL, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 1 to 3 in paying the amount to the . petitioner in respect of life insurance policies of the deceased Smt. Marni Usha Rani @ Marini Usha Rani for which the petitioner is the nominee as arbitrary, irrational and illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to pay the amounts to the petitioner in respect of the policies bearing Nos. L2410058A and L2410058B stood in name of deceased Smt. Marni Usha Rani, for which the petitioner is the nominee forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 25183 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to process the claim and pay the amounts to the petitioner in respect of the policies bearing Nos. L2410058A and L2410058B stood in name of deceased Smt. Marni Usha Rani, for which the petitioner is the nominee forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K GANI REDDY 2. GP FOR EDUCATION 3. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO 4. GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the order passed in O.S.No.295 of 2012, whereby the claim of the petitioner and the 5th respondent was considered, and the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ramachandrapuram decreed the suit by allotting one share to the plaintiff and the remaining shares equally to defendant Nos.1 and 2 therein. The 3rd respondent in the writ petition was arrayed as defendant No.5 in the said suit and, in pursuance of the decree passed by the Civil Court the issue between the parties is resolved. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 09.03.2026 PNS