1 APHC010661022017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1678 OF 2017 Between: 1. P. Pratap Reddy, S/o late P. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 58 years, Occ: Deputy E.E./E.E. (I/C), Kurnool, S.E. (FAC), Kadapa, A.P. Education & Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation, Kurnool. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri Y.S.B.S.Vittal, Managing Director, A.P. Education & Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation, Vijayawada. ...Respondent Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately violating the order o dated 14.1.2017 in W.P.M.P.No.21638/2017 in W.P.No.17721/2017 passed by this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(APPL 765 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may 2 be pleased to direct the respondents to comply with the order dated 14.7.2017 in W.P.M.P.No.21638/2017 in W.P.No.17721/2017 in its true letter and spirit, pending disposal of the Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: GADDAM SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: G SEENA KUMAR (SC FOR APEWIDC AND RVM SSA Counsel for the Respondent: G SEENA KUMAR The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.C.No.1678 of 2017 in W.P.M.P.No.21638 of 2017 In WRIT PETITION No.17721 OF 2017 ORDER: The instant contempt case has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 14.07.2017 in W.P.M.P.No.21638 of 2017 in W.P.No.17721 of 2017 on the file of erstwhile High Court at Hyderabad. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner in the morning session as well as in afternoon session. 3. The learned Standing Counsel Sri V.Ch.Naidu, represented by Sri L.Radha Krishna, brought to the notice of this Court about passing of orders dated 06.09.2017 in W.P.No.17721 of 2017, where under the said writ petition was dismissed by placing the stand taken by the respondent corporation authorities that the respondent does not propose to make the petitioner to work under his junior. 4. The learned counsel Sri L.Radha Krishna, further submits that the petitioner extended his services in the respondent corporation and retired from service on 30.06.2020 as an Executive Engineer. 4 5. In view of the fact that there is no representation for the petitioner and also considering the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel that the main writ petition itself was dismissed on 06.06.2017 and further the petitioner retired from service on 30.06.2020, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:12.02.2026 Rns 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Contempt Case No.1678 of 2017 Date:12.02.2026 Rns