Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26894 (AP)

M/S SRI DHARMA SHASTA CONTRACTORS v. Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar, IAS

CC/3915/2025 · 2026-03-31

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010664792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3915/2025 Between: 1. M/S SRI DHARMA SHASTA CONTRACTORS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A MURALI MOHAN RAO, S/O. A VENKATA NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. 18-91, KONDAPETA, BANAGANAPALLI, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT, PINCODE 518124. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R- 1) 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R-2) 3. SMT RAJAKUMARI GANIYA I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. (R-3) 4. SRI I VENU GOPAL, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PR CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (R-4) 5. SRI M RAGHURAMI REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR (PIU) DIVISION, NANDYAL @ KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (R-5) 6. SRI POTHURAJU VENUGOPAL, THE ASST DIRECTOR DISTRICT 2 MINES AND GEOLOGY NANDYALA NANDYALA DISTRICT (R6) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 11.08.2025 passed in WP No.26110 of 2024 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3915/2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 11.08.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26110 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 11.08.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26110 of 2024, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 01.04.2026 TTPPSS 4 35 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3915/2025 01.04.2026 TTPPSS