Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26892 (CAL)

RUBY BANERJEE AND ORS. v. PRIYABRATA MUKHERJEE

CO/2047/2026 · 2026-07-03

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 03.07.2026 (AD 9) (S. Banerjee) CO 2047 of 2026 Ruby Banerjee & Ors. Vs. Priyabrata Mukherjee Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharyya Mr. Neil Basu Ms. Oindrilla Sarkar Mr. Avidipta Paul …for the petitioners Ms. Hena Bhangi Mr. Indranil Srimani …for the opposite-party This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendants and is directed against order dated April 24, 2026 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 8th Court at Alipore, South 24 Parganas in Title Suit No. 621 of 2022. By the said order the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code stood rejected. However, Mr. Bhattacharyya, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing his challenge against the order impugned insofar as it relates to rejection of the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. He, however, submits that a direction be passed upon the learned trial judge to dispose of the injunction application expeditiously. 2 Heard the learned advocate for the opposite- party. The injunction application is pending from the year 2022. It has been submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner that the injunction application is otherwise ready for hearing and the written objection to the injunction application has already been filed. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the respective parties, CO 2047 of 2026 stands disposed of without interfering with the order impugned but by requesting the Learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 8th Court at Alipore, South 24 Parganas to take up the hearing of the injunction application on the next date fixed, i.e., on July 13, 2026 and to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible after affording an opportunity of hearing to the respective parties without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)