Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
07.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.04. Rakib
CRM (NDPS) 1387 of 2025
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Balurghat Police Station case no. 454 of 2025 dated 10.07.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/25/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Chhotan Rabidas.
……Petitioner. Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury Mr. Dwaipayan Panda
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Gauranga Kumar Das, Ld. APP
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the State has pointed out that although the recovery was 3190 bottles of phensedyl in the present case but the same was recovered from one Samim Sk and the petitioner was implicated on the basis of the statement of the co- accused, there has been no seizure from the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the State is represented. Having regard to the aforesaid fact that the non-recording or mis-recording of the number of bottles in the earlier order dated 06.11.2025 is of no relevance. As such, the rule earlier issued is discharged. Petitioner would continue on the bail granted on 06.11.2025. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
2 All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)