IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2236/2026 Decided on: 09.03.2026 Karam Chand ….Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Munish Datwalia, learned vice counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representations dated 01.12.2025 (Annexure P-4) seeking applicability of Brij Lal & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2OA No.2929 of 2015, decided on 06.07.2017 2 within a time bound manner. Learned vice counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 09th March, 2026(rohit)