APHC010654212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12542/2025 Between: 1. D.JAYACHANDRA ALIAS JAYAPRAKASH, S/O. D. MUNISUBBAIAH,AGED 24 YEARS, OCC STUDENT,R/O. D. NO. 1-3- 1,GENUMAGATALLI, MOGARALA,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. V. YASWANTH, S/O. V. SUDHAKAR NAIDU,AGED 22 YEARS, OCC STUDENT,R/O. D. NO. 2/12/2,VALAPULAVARIPALLI, THOTAPALLI,PAKALA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. D. RAJENDRA, S/O D. GURRAPPA,AGED 68 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 1- 1, GENUMAGATALLI, MOGARALA, DAMALACHERUVU,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. D DEVI, W/O. D. KUMARA SWAMY, AGE 36 YEARS, CASTE. BALIJA, GENUMAGATTUPALLI VILLAGE, H/O. MOGARALA, PAKALA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. RESPONDENT NO.2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 12.12.2025 IN CRL.P.NO.12542 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. D PURNA CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking to grant anticipatory bail to the 2 Petitioners / Accused Nos.3, 4 and 7, in connection with Crime No.93 of 2025 on the file of Pakala Police Station, Tirupati, which is registered for the offences under Sections 332(b), 118(1), 119(1) and 351(3) read with 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Sri K.Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State/Respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that this case is filed as a counter blast to the case registered against Respondent No.2 based on the complaint given by Accused No.2 in the present crime. Learned counsel would further submit that, there are no specific allegations against the Petitioners and they are falsely implicated. Learned counsel would submit that the Petitioners are ready to furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the Court. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that Petitioners herein were present at the relevant time and place. It is further submitted that there are five victims in the present crime and injuries sustained are grievous in nature. It is further submitted that, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail since there are specific allegations made against the Petitioners to attract the alleged offences. 5. Considering the submissions made, and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court finds that there are specific allegations against the Petitioners in the commission of the alleged offences. The record 3 further discloses that as many as five victims sustained injuries in the incident. In view of the gravity of the allegations and the nature of injuries suffered by the victims, this Court is not inclined to exercise discretion under Section 482 of BNSS. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.02.2026 Dinesh 4 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No.12542 of 2025 DATE:11.02.2026 Dinesh