[2026:JHHC:28597] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8771 of 2026 ------ Jitendra Prasad, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Vishwanath Prasad, resident of Village- Dhendhe, P.O.- Hosir, P.S.- Gomia, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand-829111 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Akchansh Kishore, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-23-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No.04 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. Case No.39 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 419, 420, 466, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joined as Laboratory Technician in the Health Department, Government of Jharkhand on the basis of fake and forged document issued by a fake institute. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-35 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that in the meanwhile after due verification of the documents, the service of the petitioner has been terminated. It is also submitted that charge- sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.11.2024 passed in B.A. No.9490 of 2024. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No.04 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. Case No.39 of 2016 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-23.09.2026-Animesh/