APHC010653492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3822/2025 Between: 1. NAKKA VEERA RAGHAVULU @ RAGHAVULU, S/O. SITARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1 GUNNAMPALLI VILLAGE,DWARAKA TIRUMALA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI K VETRISELVI I A S, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRI 3. SRI M J ABHISHEK GOUD I A S, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, THE JOINT DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. SRI ACHUT AMBRESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. G V SUBBARAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN THE TAHSILDAR, QWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. T SUDHEER, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN REP., BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER DWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3822/2025 NAKKA VEERA RAGHAVULU @ RAGHAVULU, S/O. SITARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-2,KAPPALAGUNTA. H/O. GUNNAMPALLI VILLAGE,DWARAKA TIRUMALA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SRI K VETRISELVI I A S, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRI SRI M J ABHISHEK GOUD I A S, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, THE JOINT DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU SRI ACHUT AMBRESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU ARAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN THE TAHSILDAR, QWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU DISTRICT. T SUDHEER, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN REP., BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER DWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3505] NAKKA VEERA RAGHAVULU @ RAGHAVULU, S/O. SITARAMAIAH, 2,KAPPALAGUNTA. H/O. GUNNAMPALLI VILLAGE,DWARAKA TIRUMALA, WEST GODAVARI ...PETITIONER NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, SRI K VETRISELVI I A S, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. SRI M J ABHISHEK GOUD I A S, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, THE JOINT DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU SRI ACHUT AMBRESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU ARAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN THE TAHSILDAR, QWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU DISTRICT. T SUDHEER, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN REP., BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER DWARAKA TIRUMALA, ELURU 2 DISTRICT 7. G RAMALAXMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN GUNNAMPALLY GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP., BY ITS SECRETARY, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to summon the respondent herein and to punish him for not obeying the lawful orders of the Honourable Court in I A No 1 of 2025 in WP No. 11951 of 2025, Dt. 02,05.2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y KOTESWARA RAO 2. J DILEEP KUMAR 3. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3822/2025 The Court made the following Order: The present Contempt Case is filed against the respondents alleging that they have violated interim order dated 02.05.2025 passed in W.P.No.11951 of 2025. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that this court directed the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.58 cents in RS.No.279/1/E of Kapalakunta Village, H/o Gunnampalli Village of Dwaraka Tirumala, Mandal, West Godavari District. 3. On perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it is stated that the respondents started digging activity and removed the stones laid around the subject land on 17.11.2025. By virtue of the said action it is contented that the respondents have violated the order passed by this court. 4. On the other hand, the 7th respondent filed counter-affidavit stating that, the respondents never interfered with the subject land nor violated the orders of this court as alleged by the petitioner. It is further averred in the counter- affidavit that in order to recover the house tax pertaining to the property in Door No.3-1-93, belonging to one Smt.Vijayalakashmi, who is the adjacent owner of the petitioner’s property, the 7th respondent went there and did not involve in digging activity as alleged. Though, the counsel for the petitioner 4 strenuously submits that the respondents have interfered with her possession and enjoyment by flouting the orders of this court, to substantiate the same nothing is placed on record except making bald allegations in the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case. Further on perusal of the photographs filed along with the contempt case would also reflect that there is no digging activity as alleged by the petitioner in the subject property. 5. In view of the above, there are no merits in the present contempt case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date 30.01.2026 KKV