CHARNJIT SINGH MULTANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/34940/2026 · 2026-07-07
N S Shekhawat
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26871 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 26871 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-34940-2026 Date of Decision:07.07.2026 Charanjit Singh Multani and Anr. …Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and Ors.
…Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Harsh Garg, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C). Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to quash the impugned notices/summons (Annexures P-7 and P-8), which were issued by respondent No.2 under Section179 of B.N.S.S. A further prayer has been made to quash all consequential proceedings emanating from application No.PGD-1858, dated 08.05.2026.
2. Pursuant to the notice, Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab has appeared on behalf of official respondents and on instructions from ASI Ramesh Kumar submits that various complaints were received in the present case, however, all the complaints related to the subject matter of the present petition have already been looked into and ordered to be filed. He further submits that since the applications received in the present case have already been consigned to records, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 07.07.2026
JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.07.07 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh