Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP No.20067 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CWP No.20067 of 2026 Date of decision: July 7th, 2026 Usha Rani .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. This is a civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 19.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) submitted by the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was the owner of 2 kanals and 8 marlas land which was acquired by HSVP for residential and commercial area in Sector 9, 32 Karnal by notification dated 24.12.2002 and the possession of the land of the petitioner was taken over by the HSVP and the award was also announced on
21.12.2004. It is submitted that the petitioner is an oustee and for the redressal of her grievance, she has given a representation dated 19.01.2026.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.07 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CWP No.20067 of 2026 2 has not applied for allotment of a plot under the oustee category and has further submitted that in case any fresh advertisement is made by the respondents, the petitioner can apply under the said Rehabilitation and Settlement Policy of the Government of Haryana or any other policy which is in force and in case such application is filed, the same would be considered by the respondents in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition be disposed of but respondents be bound by the statement made before this Court.
5. Ordered accordingly.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE July 7th, 2026
(SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.07 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh