Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26861 (CAL)

AMAL KUMAR DAS v. MARY RANI DAS

CO/1390/2026 · 2026-07-02

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L- 679 02/07/2026 Ct. No.- 6 Aritra C.O. 1390 of 2026 Amal Kumar Das Vs. Mary Rani Das Mr. Satyam Mukherjee Mr. Soibal Rakshit ….for the petitioner Mr. Souma Subhra Ray Ms. Neelam Kumari Ms. Priyanka Patra Ms. Vedatri Bhattacharya ….for the opposite party This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) at Barasat to dispose of the injunction application filed in Title Suit No.1113 of 2024 expeditiously. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the injunction application is otherwise ready for hearing and August 25, 2026 is fixed for hearing of the said application. Heard the learned advocate for the opposite party on such submission. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the respective parties, CO 1390 of 2026 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) at Barasat to take up the hearing of the injunction application on the next date fixed, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing and to make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible but preferably within a period of 120 working days from the 2 next date fixed without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. There will be no order as to costs. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)