1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 104 of 2026 Decided on: 23.02.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ramesh Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks enforcement of Ramesh Kumar versus State of H.P and others.2 3. At this stage, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 21.02.2026 from Director, School Education, H.P. conveying decision of petitioner’s representation under office order of even date. Copy of said office order has been enclosed with aforesaid office instructions. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.10992/2025, decided on 10.07.2025. 2 4. Taking notice of the office instructions and accompanying office order, the present execution petition is disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy against the consideration order in case he feels aggrieved against it. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua February 23, 2026 Judge yogesh