Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2686 (CHH)

SAAZID HASHMI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/933/2020 · 2026-01-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2403 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 933 of 2020 Saazid Hashmi S/o (Late) Haidar Hashmi Aged About 45 Years R/o 72/3, Ansuiya Bai Yadav Gali, Takiyapara, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station, Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondents /State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 15.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Mahendra Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of CrPC seeking following prayers : ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 “Therefore it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and further be pleased to quash the impugned First Information Report/ Crime no. 272/2020 dated 21/04/2020 (ANNEXURE-A/1) registered against the present Petitioner at Police Station – Civil Lines, Bilaspur, district Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh and investigation thereto for offences punishable under section 188 and 505(1) of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 of the Epidemic Act 1897, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned State counsel submits that a closure report has already been filed after due investigation of the case. 4. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra