07.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.01. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (M) 2915 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Canning Police Station case no. 642 of 2024 dated 16.09.2024 under Sections 87/64(2)(m)/352/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 6/17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 read with Sections 9/11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 read with Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. And In the matter of : XXX ……Petitioner. Mr. Samim Ahammed Mr. Asif Ikbal Baidya .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Gauranga Kumar Das, Ld. APP Mr. Amal Kumar Datta ……for the State. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent of the charges and unnecessarily he has been detained in custody. Learned advocate appearing for the State has drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as the medical report. Having regard to the factum that prima facie, prosecution has been able to establish their case. At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail without the evidence having commenced. Thus, CRM (M) 2915 of 2025 is dismissed. 2 All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)