Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26855 (JHR)

JAYPAL SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8809/2026 · 2026-09-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:28426] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8809 of 2026 ------ Jaypal Singh, aged 41 years, S/O Birendra Singh, R/o Basri, P.O. & P.S. Lohardaga, Dist. Lohardaga, Jharkhand – 835302 .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate Mr. Anurag Raj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-21-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.473 of 2025 (S.T. Case No.108 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1), 238(a), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed the murder of Tanushree Kumari and caused disappearance of the evidence of murder to save himself and the co-accused of the offence of murder. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and on the basis of his self-confessional statement. It is also submitted that though charge has already been framed but no witness has been examined as yet. It is also submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.4212 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.10.2025 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-XII, Ranchi in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.473 of 2025 (S.T. Case No.108 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-21.09.2026-Animesh/