Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26853 (JHR)

SURENDRA KUMAR SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/498/2023 · 2026-09-21

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:28535 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 498 of 2023 --------- Surendra Kumar Sinha, aged about 74 years, son of Late Rameshwar Sinha, retired Executive Engineer, Ayojan and Monitoring Division, Medininagar, P.O. and P.S. Medininagar, District Palamau at Datlonganj. At present residing at Basanti Vihar Colony, Opposite D.A.V. School, Hehal, P.O. Lalgutwa, Pisca Itki Road, P.S. Nagri, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Prashant Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Water Resources Department, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Mr. Pradeep Gupta, son of not known to the petitioner, Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Mr. Janardhan Mahto, son of not known to the petitioner, Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, Joint Secretary (Management Cell), Water Resources Department, having its office at Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. ....Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Zaid Imam, A.C. to S.C.-VII --------- 19/Dated:-21.09.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he has received monetary benefit; as such, he prays that the instant application may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner that if at all, there would be any calculation error/right of the petitioner is affected, he can move before the appropriate authority. 2. There is no objection from the Opposite Parties. 2026:JHHC:28535 2 3. Having regard to the above, the instant application is disposed of with the liberty as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 26/09/2026