APHC010651022013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9847/2013 Between: 1. SAKA DEVADAS, ASST.SUB-INSPECTOR,APSRTC, S/O MAHADEVA RAO, AGE 59 YRS.,RIO APHB COLONY, LALACHERUVU,RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE APSRTC REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE VIGILANCE SECURITY OFFICER, APSRTC VIJAYAWADA ZONE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE LABOUR COURT, GUNTUR, REP BY ITS PRESIDING OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of "certiorari " by calling for the records relating to and in connection with the award of the Labor Court, Guntur, passed in I..D No 160 / 2006 dt. 16-6-2011, which was published in the Gazette vide GORT No 1139, dt. 19-7- 2011, in confirming the order of removal from service as unjust and illegal, contrary to well established principles of law, and as such quash the award by consequently direct the Respondents herein to pay all the wages for the removal period along with service benefits from 1975 to till retirement on 28-2-2013 forthwith along with all benefits and to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 12269 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to pay the service benefits to the petitioner from 1975 to till 12.5.2006 pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC 2. . The Court made the following: 3 Order:- This Court, while admitting the writ petition, directed the respondents to settle the terminal benefits which are eligible to be paid to the petitioner. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the award passed by the Labour Court in I.D. No.160/06, whereby the claim of the petitioner was dismissed, upholding the findings of the enquiry officer. The petitioner was removed from service and has also attained the age of superannuation. 3. Considering the same, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim direction passed by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.02.2026 PNS