Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26846 (JHR)

AADARSH KUMAR ALIAS DHONI @ ADARSH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8828/2026 · 2026-09-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:28422 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8828 of 2026 ------ Aadarsh Kumar @ Dhoni @ Adarsh Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Gyani Singh, resident of Village-Tetrai, P.O. & P.S.-Panki, Dist.-Palamau … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 21.09.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Daltonganj Sahar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed murder of Md. Samir @ Guddu. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that main allegation of firing is upon the co-accused namely Faiz Khan and the only allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was accompanying the co-accused Faiz Khan. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 04.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para 17 of this bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 28.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6992 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau in connection with Daltonganj Sahar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 21.09.2026 Gunjan-