Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26840 (PNJ)

PARDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/17981/2026 · 2026-07-07

H S Grewal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-17981-2026 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 279 CRM-M-17981-2026 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 PARDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER ....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Anmol Verma, Advocate the petitioners. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 5. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS (U/s 482 of Cr.P.C.) for quashing of FIR No. 316 dated 25.12.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 3(5), 333 and 351(3) of BNS (Sections 323, 324, 34, 509, 506 IPC) registered at Police Station Dadri Sadar, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana on the basis of compromise/settlement (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Charkhi Dadri and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Charkhi Dadri has submitted copy of report to the effect RENU RAWAT 2026.07.08 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-17981-2026 2 that he compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainants have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 316 dated 25.12.2025 under Sections 115, 118(1), 3(5), 333 and 351(3) of BNS (Sections 323, 324, 34, 509, 506 IPC) registered at Police Station Dadri Sadar, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). 7. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 07.07.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.07.08 16.14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh