Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2684 (CHH)

SARVARKAR MAHANT YAGGANAND BRAHMACHARI v. REGISTRAR PUBLIC TRUST ACT CUM SDO REVENUE

WP227/430/2020 · 2026-03-17

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13087 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 430 of 2020 Sarvarkar Mahant Yagganand Brahmachari S/o Late Shri Sabarkar Mahant Gautamanand Brahmachari Aged About 65 Years R/o Kila Mandir Tamer Para, Durg, Tahsil/district- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Registrar Public Trust Act Cum Sdo Revenue Durg, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Shanar Lal Tarakar S/o Lt. Shri Manglu Tamrakar R/o Tamer Para, Durg, Tahsil/ District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Laxminath Tamrakar S/o Lt. Shri Pannalal Tamrakar R/o Maitil Para, Tahsil/district-Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Balram Krishi ( Production And) Co-Operative Society, R/o Sabko Jila Sahakari Kendria Bank Maryadit Near District- Hospital, Tahsil/district- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Durg, District-Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.03.19 19:27:49 +0530 2 For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Isha Jajodia, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 18/03/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, due to inadvertence, the present petition has been filed and he may be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under law. 2. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner are not opposed by the other side. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. The certified copies of the annexures shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining attested true copies thereof. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved