Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26838 (PNJ)

KRISHAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/36093/2026 · 2026-07-07

Vikram Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.36093 of 2026 Date of Decision:-07.07.2026 Krishan and others …..Petitioners. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Sweta Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘the BNSS’) read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of directions to the respondent-authorities to consider and decide the representations dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-2) and to take action in accordance with law. Prayer has also been made for issuance of a direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 7. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite submission of the application/representation (Annexure P-2), no FIR has been registered. 3. Having gone through the petition and having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant YAG DUTT 2026.07.08 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M No.36093 of 2026 -2- petition is disposed of with a direction to the Authority concerned to look into the application/representation (Annexure P-2) and to take action, if so warranted, in accordance with law. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 07, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.08 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.