APHC010650932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2393/2018 Between: 1. SIRIGIRI RAVI, R/O. BALIJA, ANMUMAAPALLI, VILLAGE, RACHERLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. GUDDANTI DANDI KIRAN BABU, R/O. EPURUPALEM VILLAGE, CHIRALA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. 3. THUPIRA SIVA KRISHNA, R/O. MOCHERLA VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KAVALI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the above said CrI.R.C. by duly setting aside the order made in P.R.C No. 27 of 2018, dated 25-06-2018 (in Crime No. 56 of 2015) passed by Honble Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class Markapur, with direction to the Court below, to re-call the warrants issued against the petitioners herein, in the interest of justice and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order made in P.R.C. No. 27 of 2018, dated 25.6.2018 (in Crime No. 56 of 2015) of the Hon'ble Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Cass, Markapur, with a direction to the Court below to recall the warrants issued against the petitioners herein, pending the disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P VINOD LAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2393 OF 2018 ORDER: None appeared for the revision petitioners. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State would submit that revision was filed challenging the cognizance order dated 25.06.2018 of the learned Magistrate for taking cognizance for the offence under Sections 379 and 201 of IPC and Section 27(2) of the Arms Act and taking case on file against A1 to A3 vide PRC.No.27 of 2018 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Markapur. Pending the revision, learned Magistrate disposed of the PRC and committed the case to the Sessions Division, Ongole, as per the report submitted by the learned Magistrate. 3. He would further submit that as per the committal order, accused/A1 i.e., Revision Petitioner No.1 is no more, as recorded by the learned trial Court. The order would also show that A2 and A3, who are on bail, and they were directed to remain on bail so during and until the conclusion of trial, as required under Section 209(b) Cr.P.C. In the circumstances, revision become infructuous. 4. Perusal of the order dated 25.06.2018 of the learned Magistrate now under challenge would show that learned Magistrate took cognizance for the offence under Sections 379 and 201 of IPC and 4 under Section 27(2) of Arms Act and took up the case against the revision petitioners/A1 to A3 and registered the case as PRC No.27 of 2018 and issued Non-bailable Warrants against the accused. 5. Now, as per the order dated 07.10.2024 passed in PRC No.27 of 2018 by the learned Magistrate, the case was committed to Sessions Division, Ongole. Further, as per the said order, A1 died and it was recorded in the order. The order would also disclose that the accused/A2 and A3 are on bail. In those circumstances, as rightly contended by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, no further orders are required in the revision petition. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the concerned Sessions Court for necessary redressal in accordance with law, if they are aggrieved that no case has been made out against them, they are entitled to seek discharge from the case, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 05.02.2026 Pmk 5 41 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2393 OF 2018 Date: 05.02.2026 Pmk