IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision (FC) No.48 of 2026 Date of Decision: 01.10.2026 _______________________________________________________________________ Ranjeet Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Smt. Reena Devi and Another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Yogesh Jaswal, Judge Whether approved for reporting? _______________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Raj Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. B.N. Mishra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sourabh Chand, Advocate. ____________________________________________________________________ Ajay Mohan Goel, J. (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has approached this Court praying for the following main relief: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the present revision petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned judgment dated 24.06.2024, as ha been passed by the Ld. Family Court at Kinnaur at Rampur, in CIS CNR No. HPK101-001455-2022 titled as Reena Devi & another V/s Ranjeet Singh, may kindly be quashed and set aside and in the interest of justice and fair play.” 2. During the course of the hearing of this petition, the matter was referred for mediation and as per the report of the learned -2- Mediator, dated 29.06.2026, the matter stands amicably settled between the parties in terms of the contents of the report of the learned Mediator. 3. Accordingly, as prayed for, these proceedings are closed in the light of the settlement that has been arrived at between the parties. 4. The Court also stands informed that the amount, as has been settled between the parties, stands paid by the petitioner to the respondent-wife, except an amount of ₹74,000/- (approximately), qua which learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FDR of the said amount already stands deposited with the Registry of this Court, which can be released in favour of the respondent. 5. The parties shall withdraw all the cases intra them in the light of the said settlement. 6. The parties shall also honour the commitment made before the learned Mediator that they will be approaching the appropriate Court for a decree of divorce by mutual consent. 7. The Registry is further directed to release the FDR, which has been deposited by the petitioner for an amount of ₹74,000/- (approximately), in favour of the respondent, in her bank account, details whereof shall be provided to the Registry by the learned counsel for the respondent. The order under challenge in this particular -3- petition also stands modified in terms of the settlement entered into between the parties. (Ajay Mohan Goel), Judge (Yogesh Jaswal), Judge October 01, 2026 Rajeev Raturi