Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 26833 (CAL)

HIMANGSHU MANNA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/13901/2026 · 2026-07-07

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

7 0077..0077..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 13901 of 2026 Himangshu Manna Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. S.N. Chakraborty …for the petitioner Mr. Suryaneel Das Ms. Suchitra Sinha Chatterjee Ms. Sumita Sarkar …for the State Mr. Goutam Das …for the respondent nos. 4 to 6 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Matter is heard in presence of learned advocates representing petitioner, State respondent and respondent nos. 4 to 6. 3. On looking into the prayers made in this writ petition it appears that petitioner has tried to make out a case for preserving his tenancy right thereby mandamus is sought for upon the concerned police authorities to issue necessary direction. If petitioner is aggrieved by acts and actions of his landlord and if it is found that his tenancy right cannot be protected in that event petitioner is required to approach Civil Court in pursuit of remedy. 2 4. Police authority is not the appropriate authority to decide petitioner’s tenancy right and to take steps to protect the same. 5. Hence, present writ petition is dismissed. 6. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)